Scripto · Transcription

Return to revision history

--- Revision as of 8:48:46, 28 December 2021 by JBFeast

Created page with "THURSDAY 1 FEBRUARY 1968 <br> 32nd day - 334 days to come ---- Thinking of an idea for a "drafting" games which could <br> be called VISUALIZATION. There are a series of..."
+++ Revision as of 9:05:58, 28 December 2021 by JBFeast
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ----
 Thinking of an idea for a "drafting" games which could  <br>
-be called VISUALIZATION. There are a series of cards   <br>
+be called <u>VISUALIZATION</u>. There are a series of cards   <br>
 showing a top view of a rectangular object with cutouts.   <br>
 Another set has front views, and a third set   <br>
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 The views are made so that they can fit together in   <br>
 different ways. Some type of "Rummy" play would probably  <br>
-be best, with, perhaps, three separate draw and discard piles
+be best, with, perhaps, three separate draw and discard piles.
+Alice called. Letter from X reporting on the sales of all the  <br>
+game submitted by I-S.  <br>
+They are playtesting : - <u>RED LETTER</u>, <u>CAPTURE THE CARGO</u>, <u>FORMATION</u>,  <br>
+<u>PERCEPTION</u>.  <br>
+The following are scheduled for their initial line  - <u>SHAPE AND SHATTER</u>,   <br>
+<u>COLOR CONFUSION</u>, <u>TRIPLE CROSS</u>, <u>STACK STICKS, DEDUCTION</u>.  <br>
+The following are being returned : - <u>WHOZAT?</u> (Too indefinite.)  <br>
+<u>PITFALL</u> (Like it, but don't want to go into such elaborate product at  <br>
+present. May want to look at it again but don't feel it is fair to  <br>
+hold it (!)). <u>PARTY POLITICS</u> (Started off interesting, but got  <br>
+dull towards the end. Also it is too seasonal in interest.) [I reminded  <br>
+Alice that we had agreed not to send it because of <u>NOMINATION</u>,  <br>
+she said she was sorry.]