Return to revision history
Revision as of 10:09:12, 25 June 2025 by Lboland
Revision as of 10:09:55, 25 June 2025 by Lboland
This revision marked as approved.
Line 43: Line 43:
group, 2 for 2, 5 for 3, 7 for 4, 10 for 5, and 5 more for   
group, 2 for 2, 5 for 3, 7 for 4, 10 for 5, and 5 more for   
each additional). Reduced the number of points so that a player  
each additional). Reduced the number of points so that a player  
with a good sized group wouldn't automatically win: 1 point for 1, <br>
with a good sized group wouldn't automatically win: 1 point for 1,  
2 for 2, 3 for 3, 5 for 4, 7 for 5, 10 for 6, 12 for 7, 15 for 8,  <br>
2 for 2, 3 for 3, 5 for 4, 7 for 5, 10 for 6, 12 for 7, 15 for 8,   
20 for 9, 25 for 10, etc. <br>
20 for 9, 25 for 10, etc. <br>
Called Phil to tell him of my ideas. As I was telling him about <br>
Called Phil to tell him of my ideas. As I was telling him about  
the hex bidding layouts, I realized that 6 bidding cards would  <br>
the hex bidding layouts, I realized that 6 bidding cards would   
be required. We decided against that. Instead we can use a hex <br>
be required. We decided against that. Instead we can use a hex  
layout for the land portion, or possibly the staggered <br>
layout for the land portion, or possibly the staggered <br>
(cont. on 7/21)
(cont. on 7/21)