Compare revisions: 1971_Sackson_157_May 17.jpg
| 
                    
                                         first draft 
                                     | 
                
                    
                                         finished page 
                                     | 
            ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 
                     This revision marked as completed.                     This revision marked as approved.                  | 
            |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
and <u>THE MOEBIES</u>. He doesn't like the contracts "hold harmless" and  | and <u>THE MOEBIES</u>. He doesn't like the contracts "hold harmless" and  | ||
only $250 advance. (Didn't tell him Felicia got $500.)  | only $250 advance. (Didn't tell him Felicia got $500.)  | ||
He was surprised that 3M didn't have <u>GOOD KNIGHT</u> out yet.   | |||
With him to Vandow-Fenton where <u>Joyce Swayse</u> of Small Wonders  | |||
was displaying some puzzles by <u>Stewart Coffin</u> and other non-game  | |||
items (including prints by Tom's daughter). She may be preparing  | |||
a catalog and would like to include <u>''AGOG''</u>. Told her of it being  | |||
remaindered and she'll pick up some in Marboro. Tom said that  | |||
he would act as my agent for a paperback publisher. We were  | |||
supposed to discuss it further but never got around to it.  | |||
Joyce took me a booth run by Rathcon featuring items put out  | |||
jointly by The Museum of Modern Art and ''Playboy'' Magazine.  | |||
One item was <u>MULTIPLICATIONS</u> (see 1970) in a clear set and one  | |||
with pictures of nudes to be assembled.  | |||
She would be interested in <u>BAZAAR</u> if 3M releases it. Tom  | |||
said that 3M is still looking for another spot for <u>PHLOUNDER</u>.  | |||
Tom has some friends who get gov't. money working on games. They  | |||
now have some connection with industries who need training  | |||
games. Tom asked if I would be willing to come up with those  | |||
for a fee of $1,000±. I said I'd be willing to discuss it.  | |||
I told Tom he should check with Alex about Entex' rules for  | |||
<u>!@#C&*!</u>.   | |||
(cont. on 5/16)  | |||