Compare revisions: 1973_Sackson_058_February 07.jpg
|
This revision marked as completed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
new play principles. I am not attempting to put down any of <br> | new play principles. I am not attempting to put down any of <br> | ||
the details.) <br> | the details.) <br> | ||
I suggested A.H. but Mel tried them and they are not using | I suggested A.H. but Mel tried them and they are not using <br> | ||
any new sources. | any new sources. Showed him <u>FEUDAL</u> as the reason that 3M <br> | ||
would not be interested. I told him I'd talk to Felicia about it <br> | |||
and let him know whether she is interested. <br> | |||
Bill Sullivan, at Simulations (a researcher - Dale tells me) gave Mel <br> | |||
<u>Phil Orbanes</u>' number as well as mine, but told Mel to watch out for <br> | |||
Phil. I told Mel he had no reason to worry. He'll call Phil, altho I <br> | |||
told him that there probably wasn't much chance. | |||
During day called <u>Odette Willis</u> and changed our date at Felicia's to <br> | |||
Thursday at 2. Checked it with <u>Felicia</u>. Then called <u>Claude</u> <br> | |||
and set up Thursday at 4 for him to show her <u>UPSTAGE</u>. | |||
---- | |||
(cont. from 2/8) [2/8] | |||
them easier to follow. I'll go there at 12:30 on 2/15 to look <br> | |||
at the rules, and the company will get lunch. | |||
Played 2-hand <u>THE BRAIN GAME</u> with BB. Played quite well. I thought <br> | |||
that BB was way ahead but it ended quite close. The ending with the <br> | |||
7-11 etc. seemed fine - not that it lasted very long. A point that <br> | |||
came up - a player with a double does not have to tread out of <br> | |||
classification if he does not have more than one of any classification | |||