Compare revisions: 1972_Sackson_295_October 01.jpg
First draft
|
Italicize publication names
|
||
---|---|---|---|
This revision marked as completed. This revision marked as approved. |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1 SUNDAY - OCTOBER 1972 | |||
<br>EIGHTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY - 275TH DAY - 91 DAYS TO COME | |||
---- | |||
The name <u>Jim Bynum</u> I saw at <u>Martin</u>'s yesterday | |||
sounded familiar to me. Checked, and had sent me | |||
a game <u>THE NINE CHECKER GAME</u>. | |||
BB got 15 more copies of <u>NO WAY</u> at Boston Road ^yesterday, this | |||
time with the numbers written in. I played with it and | |||
decided to allow a circle to be visited twice and have only | |||
5 forbidden pairs. This way I am pretty sure that any setup | |||
can be solved. The less revisited circles the better the solution. | |||
Marylin's Eliot solved one, but couldn't do a second. | |||
<u>Marylin</u> picked up a book <u>''ELECTRONIC GAMES''</u> at a library sale. | |||
(It cost her 10¢.) | |||
---- | |||
(cont. from 9/29)[9/30] | |||
---- | |||
<u>Martin</u> said that any cube from <u>MacMahon</u>'s set could | |||
by [be] replicated by using the proper 8 others, and also interior <s>side</s> face | |||
joints match. By calling for the matching, Martin said, the | |||
problem becomes much easier. | |||
<u>T.H. O'Beirne</u> had a column in <u>''THE NEW SCIENTIST''</u> in 1961 and 1962. | |||
The best of it went into his book, <u>''PUZZLES AND PARADOXES''</u>. Martin | |||
suggested him as a possible <u>''G & P''</u> columnist. | |||
<u>Conway</u> spent hours trying to prove <u>NINE OF SWORDS</u> unique. | |||
Conway sent Martin a cube <u>PUZZLE</u> which is very tricky. <br> | |||
It can't be solved unless the small pcs. [pieces] are placed first - | |||
being propped up. Martin suggested Tom Atwater trying to | |||
sell it. The pcs., which are to be formed into a 5 x 5 x 5 cube | |||
are as follows:- 13 of 1 x 2 x 4, 3 of 1 x 1 x 3, 1 of 1 x 2 x 2, 1 of 2 x 2 x 2. | |||
O'Beirne sent him two <u>PUZZLE</u>S based on the same principle- | |||
3 of 1 x 1 x 3, 2 of 1 x 2 x 4, 3 of 2 x 2 x 3, and 4 of 1 x 4 x 4. | |||
1 of 1 x 1 x 1, 1 of 1 x 1 x 3, 3 of 1 x 2 x 2, 7 of 2 x 2 x 3, 1 of 1 x 3 x 3, and | |||
1 of 1 x 4 x 4. | |||
Returned the 3 letters borrowed on 9/7, with <u>MEANDER</u>, <u>FEZ</u>, etc. <br> | |||
Borrowed a letter from <u>Colin Vout</u>, Secretary of the Puzzles | |||
and Games Ring, Cambridge University Achimideans. [University of Cambridge Archimedeans] Contained | |||
games - <u>DODGEM</u>, <u>SERPENT</u>, and an unnamed <u>GAME</u>. | |||
Somewhere saw the game <u>SIM</u> (see 7/5/69) but it had the name Arch | |||
Napier connected with it. | |||
Took a copy of a form letter Martin has for answering certain letters. | |||
Martin was approached by <u>''WORLD''</u> Magazine for a new type of liter- | |||
ary <u>PUZZLE</u>. He came up with a few. One they seemed to like | |||
was taking a known stanza of a poem and arranging the | |||
words into a new poem; also taking the letters of the poet's | |||
name and forming a new name. He paid a correspondent in | |||
England to come up with some samples. But now he hasn't heard | |||
from the magazine. | |||
On the way to and from Martin's we discussed my column | |||
in <u>''G & P''</u>; some criticisms; particularly that "readers" | |||
games should be able to be played with very little effort | |||
by the reader; my opinion of <u>SPECULATE</u> (he agrees that | |||
(cont. on - 9) |