This revision marked as approved.
Line 1: Line 1:
12-15-1971
Wednesday, 15th of December, 1971


Call from Felicia, she wrote to Keith Tuggle, and included my request for clarification on "Knowledge" game, stating that I said it sounded like <u>FACTS IN FIVE.</u>
Read an Xmas card from <u>Felicia</u>.
 
Call from <u>Felicia</u>, she wrote to Keith Tuggle, and included my request for clarification on "Knowledge" game, stating that I said it sounded like <u>FACTS IN FIVE.</u>


When she spoke to Audy Luftig and told him about the "assignment" from 3M the thought it was a rather lousy scheme. He thinks that the participating inventors should get a nominal fee for submitting a game, to be counted against royalties if the game is accepted. Felicia sent this to Keith as a suggestion, not a demand.
When she spoke to Audy Luftig and told him about the "assignment" from 3M the thought it was a rather lousy scheme. He thinks that the participating inventors should get a nominal fee for submitting a game, to be counted against royalties if the game is accepted. Felicia sent this to Keith as a suggestion, not a demand.
Line 26: Line 28:


Sellman told her that he is interest in Lillian Voegelin's <u>What's It Worth In Dollars</u> . But M.B. is also interested in it. I told Felicia that, unless she objected, I would tell Claude
Sellman told her that he is interest in Lillian Voegelin's <u>What's It Worth In Dollars</u> . But M.B. is also interested in it. I told Felicia that, unless she objected, I would tell Claude
(cont on 11/6)